Eurovision-ary: How performers capture the ears—and moods—of global audiences

Eurovision-ary: How performers capture the ears—and moods—of global audiences

The 66th season of the Eurovision Song Contest is here, and if previous years are any indication 2022 will be another heavy hitter when it comes to viewership. But at the same time, the international music competition also provides insight into the emotions of the audience—through the mood of the songs they vote to win. 

In addition to boasting seasons that have attracted more than 180 million viewers each year for the last seven years1, Eurovision’s international audience of music enthusiasts eagerly look forward to rooting for their favorite artists—and discovering new music. And with the variety of music being presented at this year’s contest, audiences will be able to find a song to suit virtually every mood—because the performers showcase more moods with each new year of competition. According to Gracenote Global Music Data Sonic Descriptors sonic mood analysis of previous Eurovision contests, recent Eurovision winners have displayed far more emotional range than their predecessors. The 40 songs presented at this year’s contest represent 15 different primary moods. And the last 15 winners have represented 12 primary moods, while only 11 moods were represented amongst the winners of the entire first 40 years of the competition.

And with the variety of music being presented at this year’s contest, audiences will be able to find a song to suit virtually every mood—because the performers showcase more moods with each new year of competition. According to Gracenote Global Music Data Sonic Descriptors sonic mood analysis of previous Eurovision contests, recent Eurovision winners have displayed far more emotional range than their predecessors. The 40 songs presented at this year’s contest represent 15 different primary moods. And the last 15 winners have represented 12 primary moods, while only 11 moods were represented among the winners of the entire first 40 years of the competition.

Gracenote sonic moods of Eurovision Song Contest winners

The recent uptick in emotional diversity isn’t surprising—consumers are increasingly looking for experiences that engage with them as individuals, and creators are rushing to fill the gap. American television, for instance, now features 817,000 unique program titles across traditional TV and streaming services, compared with just over 646,000 titles in 20192. For musicians and streaming services looking to reach and engage new audiences, Eurovision trends can be a finger on the pulse of global audiences and their moods.

And according to this year’s choices, audiences are looking for performers to energize and soothe them. Twenty song finalists—half the field—feature more energetic moods, despite this category being a less-common winner. An additional seven entries feature calmer moods, including submissions from Italy and the Netherlands—two favorites to win the contest this year. This bucks the trend of previous contests, but reflects a recent change in consumer sentiment. 

Gracenote sonic moods of 2022 Eurovision Song Contest entries

Faced with mounting supply chain woes, increasing inflation and the war in Ukraine, consumer confidence is at its lowest since the pandemic3. It’s no wonder audiences are looking for music that uplifts and reassures them. And Eurovision artists are meeting the moment.

Contrast this year’s trends with last year’s winner: “Zitti e Buoni,” a song classified as rowdy—the first time such a mood has won the competition. At the time of last year’s contest, many countries were lifting their COVID-related restrictions, and consumer confidence in Europe was its highest since October 20183. Americans echoed this sentiment, as a Nielsen custom consumer sentiment study found that in June of 2021, 90% of consumers said they were “ready to go” and get back to normal. Before the omicron spike later in the year, audiences were enthusiastic about emerging from over a year behind doors—and the choice of winner reflects their eagerness. 

The benefits of striking the right chord with audiences don’t stop when the contest ends. And much like we see in other high-stakes competitions, Eurovision artists often see success far outside the competition. Out of 68 winning Eurovision songs, 46 have ascended to Billboard’s Top 100 U.K. Singles Chart4. And the 1976 winner, Brotherhood of Man’s “Save Your Kisses For Me,” spent 16 weeks on the chart, six of which were in the No. 1 spot. 

Artists aren’t the only ones who can benefit from understanding and anticipating audience moods. Streaming music services can use sonic mood data to create richer playlists and stations featuring a wider range of artists that exposes listeners to different styles of music and artists that they may not have discovered on their own. 

Gracenote sonic music descriptors of Beyonce's album Lemonade.

Making it easy for audiences to find new songs and bands they’ll love is key. Applying hyper-detailed meta descriptions, like mood, to audio content help draw connections between genre, mood, era and tempo to create a more complete listener profile. This data enables nuanced discovery paths and offers audio recommendations that align with a listener’s current taste while providing them with carefully curated new options.

Notes

  1. European Broadcasting Union
  2. Gracenote Global Video Data, February 2022
  3. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
  4. Billboard

Bridging the gap: Better audience targeting with context and behavior data

Bridging the gap: Better audience targeting with context and behavior data

Data has never been more important for brands and marketers. 

As engagement with digital channels continues to rise, understanding the consumers behind those engagements is essential for matching the right message with the right audience. But if you’re only using contextual data, you’re only seeing part of the picture. For today’s marketers, combining contextual data (what’s being viewed) with behavioral data (what actions have been taken) creates a more complete picture of their target audience—and more effective messaging. 

And messaging is critical as brands gear up for big ad spending increases, particularly across emerging digital channels. According to the Nielsen 2022 Annual Marketing Report, 51% of global marketers plan to increase their over-the-top/CTV spending in the coming year. In North America, the percentage is 61%, which aligns with the increase in video streaming last year. In the U.S., Americans streamed almost 15 million years’ worth of content across subscription- and ad-supported streaming platforms.

To meet consumers where they are, marketers need high-quality data that informs their strategies and helps them reach more of their target audiences. And according to the global marketers surveyed for the 2022 Annual Marketing Report, audience targeting is their most important marketing tactic.

A majority of global marketers (69%) believe first-party data is essential for targeting strategies and reaching consumers. But, despite their agreement on the importance of audience data, 36% of marketers think deriving insights from data is either extremely or very difficult. 

Given the ever-expanding list of sources for consumer data, it’s easy to see why marketers find it difficult to glean insights from what are often disparate sets of data. But for marketers who are able to turn mountains of data sets into actionable insights, the rewards are plentiful.

According to a number of Nielsen multitouch attribution (MTA) studies, the most effective marketing tactics combine the power of both behavioral and contextual data to drive the highest ROI. Data from Nielsen Digital Ad Ratings (DAR) highlights that the average on-target percentage of ads across computer and mobile is 63%1—even for targets defined by age and gender—targets for which there’s significant data coverage and quality. 

By complementing contextual data with high-quality, deterministically sourced behavioral data, marketers can be more effective and efficient with their marketing campaigns, increasing engagement with their target audiences. And this holistic approach to audience data can also increase confidence in lead attribution and revenue impact. 

Nielsen recently conducted an analysis to validate that if you deliver the right ad to the right audience, you will improve your ROI, confirming that audience metrics are an early indicator of campaign performance.

In the study, we found that ad partners who served fewer ads to their target audience (lower left cluster) saw an average ROI of $0.25 per $1 spend, while those who delivered more ads to their target audience (upper right cluster) realized an average ROI of $2.60 per $1 spent. 

And for Barceló Hotel Group, data is critical to understanding attribution, especially as the media landscape moves toward a cookieless future. Using Nielsen’s Identity Sync, the hotel group was able to attribute 98% of conversions to actual marketing touchpoints, increasing PPC revenue share by 23% and display revenue share by 17%. By effectively monitoring and testing campaigns in near real time, Barceló marketers were able to optimize targeting, spend and strategy across channels.

As the media landscape becomes more fragmented for consumers, so too does the data landscape for marketers. And bridging the data gap is more important than ever for brands focused on narrow target audiences. Marketers that want to meet potential customers where they are need to leverage a combination of contextual and behavioral data to continually optimize campaigns for maximum impact. 

For additional insights, download our 2022 Annual Marketing Report.

Note

  1. Nielsen Advertiser Playbook